IRVING v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
| LEONITE IRVING |
| QUINCY L. BOOTH, JOHN DOE, MURIEL BOWSER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2019cv03818 |
| December 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (adh, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER directing an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $18.68 from Prison Account of LEONITE IRVING and granting MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (see order for full details). Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 1/29/2020. (adh, )
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by LEONITE IRVING. (zmd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/31/2019: #1 Supplement) (zsb). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LEONITE IRVING. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against QUINCY L. BOOTH, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JOHN DOE filed by LEONITE IRVING. (zmd) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 12/20/2019. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
