HAWKINS V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rufus Hawkins |
United States of America |
1:2020cv00826 |
March 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
James E Boasberg |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rufus Hawkins ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number DCDC-6960588) filed by Rufus Hawkins.(Hunt, Hughie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: HAWKINS V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rufus Hawkins | |
Represented By: | Hughie Duvall Hunt, II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.