MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD. v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD. |
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. |
1:2020cv01003 |
April 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Beryl A Howell |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. § 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Campbell on behalf of UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (Campbell, Christopher) |
Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy L. O'Mara on behalf of UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (O'Mara, Timothy) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel M Wall on behalf of UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (Wall, Daniel) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Fanchiang on behalf of CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (Fanchiang, Eric) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Mara Lieber on behalf of CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (Lieber, Mara) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Kent Alan Gardiner on behalf of CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (Gardiner, Kent) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Luke P. van Houwelingen on behalf of CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (van Houwelingen, Luke) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.(Reinhart, Tara) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand (Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.) by CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC..(Arteaga, Juan) |
Filing 16 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests (Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.) by CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (Arteaga, Juan) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.(Maltas, Allyson) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrdj) |
Filing 13 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Summons to Norfolk, #2 Summons to Union Pacific)(Cicala, Conte) |
Filing 12 Case transferred in from District of California Northern; Case Number 5:20-cv-00805. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 11 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER-8. Case to be transferred to Judge Beryl A. Howell at the District of Columbia. Signed by MDL Panel on 4/13/2020. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 10 NOTICE by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. of Multi District Litigation (Cicala, Conte) (Filed on 3/23/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: All parties are requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 4/3/2020. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/29/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/6/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/18/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. identifying Corporate Parent Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. for Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.. (Cicala, Conte) (Filed on 2/3/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Cicala, Conte) (Filed on 2/3/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Cicala, Conte) (Filed on 2/3/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Cicala, Conte) (Filed on 2/3/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14136847.). Filed byMitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cicala, Conte) (Filed on 2/3/2020) [Transferred from California Northern on 4/17/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.