BUERGER v. STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES et al
| STEPHANI S. BUERGER |
| AESAP DHR, STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES and ELDERLY SIMPLIFIED PROGRAM FOR SSI RETIREES |
| 1:2020cv01576 |
| June 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Receipt on 07/14/2020 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 2:20-cv-00497 sent by Alabama Middle District. (zrdj) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred to the USDC for the Middle District of Alabama, pursuant to the Court Order entered 06/24/2020. Sent to Court via Electronically. (zrdj) |
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Middle District of Alabama. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 7/14/2020. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 6/24/2020. (adh, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by STEPHANI S. BUERGER (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AESAP DHR, ELDERLY SIMPLIFIED PROGRAM FOR SSI RETIREES, STATE OF ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES filed by STEPHANI S. BUERGER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits to Complaint) (zmd) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 6/16/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
