CHAUHAN v. WOLF et al
| AMIT CHAUHAN |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD F. WOLF and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II |
| 1:2020cv01925 |
| July 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL by Brenda A. Gonzalez on behalf of WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD F. WOLF Substituting for attorney Marsha Yee (Gonzalez, Brenda) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Marsha Wellknown Yee on behalf of All Defendants (Yee, Marsha) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD F. WOLF, and U.S. Attorney (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7350772) filed by AMIT CHAUHAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #3 Exhibit EXHBIT B, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #6 Summons SUMMONS_US ATT, #7 Summons SUMMONS BARR, #8 Summons SUMMONS-CUCCINELLI, #9 Summons SUMMONS-WOLF)(Jeelani, Hashim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
