FIDLER v. POMPEO et al
NATALIE FIDLER |
MIKE POMPEO, CHAD WOLF, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II, WILLIAM PELHAM BARR, JOHN CAVENESS, MARIK STRING, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II |
1:2020cv02170 |
August 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by NATALIE FIDLER (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Johnny Hillary Walker, III on behalf of All Defendants (Walker, Johnny) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (9) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM PELHAM BARR, JOHN CAVENESS, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II, MIKE POMPEO, JENNIFER RASAMIMANANA, MARIK STRING, CHAD WOLF, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, and U.S. Attorney (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 08/10/2020. (lcrdm3) |
Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (adh, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7439922) filed by NATALIE FIDLER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.