KALAM et al v. WOLF et al
SANDEEP RANGINENI and LAKSHMI PRASANNA KALAM |
CHAD WOLF, LOREN K. MILLER, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and WILLIAM P. BARR |
1:2020cv02907 |
October 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Timothy J Kelly |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by LAKSHMI PRASANNA KALAM, SANDEEP RANGINENI (Green, Brian) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/14/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/13/2020. (Green, Brian) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, LOREN K. MILLER, CHAD WOLF, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus against WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, LOREN K. MILLER, CHAD WOLF ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7700005) filed by LAKSHMI PRASANNA KALAM, SANDEEP RANGINENI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-G, #3 Summons Civil Process Clerk, #4 Summons Loren K. Miller, #5 Summons Chad Wolf, #6 Summons William P. Barr, #7 Summons Kenneth T. Cuccinelli)(Green, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.