DWAYNE v. AZAR
| PARRIS DWAYNE |
| ALEX M AZAR II and ALEX M. AZAR, II |
| 1:2020cv03363 |
| November 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
|
|
Filing 2
ERRATA by PARRIS DWAYNE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Temple, Donald)
|
|
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to dtemplelaw@gmail.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. No signature. Please file the signed document using the event Errata., 2. All filings must have an original signature or /s/ Attorney's Name to represent an electronic signature of the filer., 3. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (ztnr, )
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (adh, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ALEX M AZAR II with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7857934) filed by PARRIS DWAYNE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons US Attorney Gerneral, #3 Summons Civil Process Clerk)(Temple, Donald)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
