GUICE v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
| OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, FLORIDA and FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION |
| GREGORY GUICE |
| 1:2020mc00086 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ERRATA by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION re #3 Memorandum in Opposition,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order (9-14-20 M.J. Kelly))(Wolfe, Douglas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Case related to Case No. 1:20-mc-87. (Wolfe, Douglas) |
| Filing 3 Memorandum in opposition to re #2 MOTION for Protective Order, #1 MOTION TO QUASH (Filing fee $ 47, receipt number 4616104179) filed by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order, #2 Exhibit Subpoena, #3 Exhibit Report, #4 Declaration Dec of Dillon Lappe, #5 Exhibit Lappe Att A, #6 Exhibit Lappe Att B, #7 Exhibit Lappe Att C, #8 Exhibit Lappe Att D, #9 Exhibit Lappe Att E, #10 Exhibit Judge Lamberth Order, #11 Exhibit Mag Judge Kelly Order 1, #12 Exhibit Mag Judge Kelly Order 2)(Wolfe, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Protective Order by GREGORY GUICE (ztd) |
| Filing 1 MOTION TO QUASH (Filing fee $ 47, receipt number 4616104179) filed by GREGORY GUICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ztd) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/24/2020: #2 Exhibit) (ztd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
