SAHNI et al v. GAYNOR et al
SHWETA SAHNI and NISHANT VIRMANI |
PETER T. GAYNOR, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and DONNA P. CAMPAGNOLO |
1:2021cv00142 |
January 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SHWETA SAHNI, NISHANT VIRMANI (Green, Brian) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 1/27/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 3/28/2021. (Green, Brian) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to DONNA P. CAMPAGNOLO, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, PETER T. GAYNOR, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (adh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for Writ of Mandamus against DONNA P. CAMPAGNOLO, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, PETER T. GAYNOR, JEFFREY A. ROSEN ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8085792) filed by SHWETA SAHNI, NISHANT VIRMANI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-H, #3 Summons Civil Process Clerk, #4 Summons Peter T. Gaynor, #5 Summons Jeffrey A. Rosen, #6 Summons Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, #7 Summons Donna Campagnolo)(Green, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.