PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
| PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, XAVIER BECERRA, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, JANET YELLEN, CHARLES P. RETTIG, DOUGLAS W. O'DONNELL, MARTIN J. WALSH and ALI KHAWAR |
| 1:2021cv02161 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by XAVIER BECERRA, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ALI KHAWAR, DOUGLAS W. O'DONNELL, CHARLES P. RETTIG, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, MARTIN J. WALSH, JANET YELLEN. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bryce, Peter) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter M. Bryce on behalf of XAVIER BECERRA, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ALI KHAWAR, DOUGLAS W. O'DONNELL, CHARLES P. RETTIG, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, MARTIN J. WALSH, JANET YELLEN (Bryce, Peter) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 08/20/2021., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/13/2021. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/19/2021.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Hand service on USAO, #2 Exhibit 2 - certified mail receipts, #3 Exhibit 3 - USPS tracking results, #4 Exhibit 4 - USPS tracking results, #5 Exhibit 5 - USPS tracking results, #6 Exhibit 6 - USPS tracking results, #7 Exhibit 7 - USPS tracking results, #8 Exhibit 8 - USPS tracking results, #9 Exhibit 9 - USPS tracking results, #10 Exhibit 10 - USPS tracking results, #11 Exhibit 11 - USPS tracking results, #12 Exhibit 12 - USPS tracking results, #13 Exhibit 13 - USPS tracking results, #14 Exhibit 14 - USPS tracking results, #15 Exhibit 15 - USPS tracking results, #16 Exhibit 16 - USPS tracking results, #17 Exhibit 17 - USPS tracking results)(Walker, Helgi) Modified on 9/13/2021 (znmw). |
| NOTICE OF ERROR re #7 Summons Returned Executed as to US Attorney; emailed to hwalker@gibsondunn.com, cc'd 6 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Do not Select All Defendants. You must select each defendant and enter the date of service for each. You can do one entry but select each defendant. (ztd, ) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/13/2021. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/12/2021.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 8/20/21., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17)(Walker, Helgi) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (15) Issued Electronically as to XAVIER BECERRA, CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ALI KHAWAR, DOUGLAS W. O'DONNELL, CHARLES P. RETTIG, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, MARTIN J. WALSH, JANET YELLEN, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Alan Richman on behalf of PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (Richman, Brian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew S. Rozen on behalf of PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (Rozen, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (adh, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION. Case related to Case No. 21-cv-95. (adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8664269) filed by PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Related Case Form, #4 Summons, #5 Rule 26.1 Statement)(Walker, Helgi) |
| Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
