HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
| HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER |
| IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT |
| 1:2021cv02291 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL by Anna Walker on behalf of IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT Substituting for attorney Stephen DeGenaro (Walker, Anna) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint by IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DeGenaro, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen DeGenaro on behalf of IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (DeGenaro, Stephen) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant's Answer or otherwise respond to #1 Complaint due by 11/10/2021. (dot) |
MINUTE ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's #6 Consent Motion for an Extension, in which Defendant seeks a 30-day extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint due to counsel's heavy caseload. Plaintiff consents to the requested extension. Defendant's Motion for an Extension is GRANTED. The Court ORDERS that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby extended up to and including NOVEMBER 10, 2021. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 9/24/21. (lcckk3)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 9/13/2021. (DM)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Lucas Marshall on behalf of HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER (Marshall, Daniel) (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/1/2021) (ztd). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8699264) filed by HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to ICE, #3 Summons to USAG, #4 Summons to USAO)(Golden, Deborah) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER v. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER | |
| Represented By: | Deborah Maxine Golden |
| Represented By: | Daniel Lucas Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT | |
| Represented By: | Anna Walker |
| Represented By: | Stephen DeGenaro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
