JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
| JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES |
| 1:2021cv02418 |
| September 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER. The parties shall file an additional Joint Status Report by February 11, 2022, which updates the court on the processing and production of responsive records. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/11/2021. (lcapm1)
|
| Filing 13 Joint STATUS REPORT by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Blankenberg, Kathryn) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER. Both a Complaint and an Answer are now before the court in this FOIA case. It is hereby ordered that the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before November 10, 2021. The Joint Status Report shall include (1) the status of Plaintiff's FOIA request; (2) the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request; (3) the anticipated date(s) for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff; (4) whether a motion to stay is likely under Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976); and (5) whether the parties anticipate summary judgment briefing and, if so, a proposed briefing schedule. See the attached Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 10/28/2021. (lcapm1)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.(Sowles, Marcia) |
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (nunc pro tunc) by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sowles, Marcia) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Marcia Kay Sowles on behalf of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (Sowles, Marcia) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendant's #10 Consent Motion for Extension of Time, Nunc Pro Tunc, in Which to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant shall file its answer on or before October 27, 2021. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 10/21/2021. (lcapm1)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Brooke Blankenberg on behalf of JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Blankenberg, Kathryn) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Kathryn B. Blankenberg, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-8789846. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Kathryn B. Blankenberg is hereby admitted pro hac vice to appear in this matter. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 10/8/2021. (lcapm1)
|
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES served on 9/21/2021 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 09/22/21. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/17/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Rothstein)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. (Orfanedes, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8732020) filed by JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for US Attorney for DC, #3 Summons for US Attorney General, #4 Summons for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)(Orfanedes, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Paul J. Orfanedes |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Brooke Blankenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES | |
| Represented By: | Marcia Kay Sowles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
