CHIGURUPATI et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
| SIRISHA CHIGURUPATI and SANTOSH KUMAR NAKIREDDI |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, ATUL KESHAP, JOEL REIFMAN, JANE DOE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, SHONNIE R. LYON, MERRICK B. GARLAND, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and JOEL R. REIFMAN |
| 1:2021cv02420 |
| September 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CHRISTOPHER WRAY served on 9/21/2021 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SHONNIE R. LYON served on 9/22/2021 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 9/20/2021 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JOEL REIFMAN served on 9/21/2021 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ATUL KESHAP served on 9/23/2021 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. IAN G. BROWNLEE served on 9/23/2021 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 9/23/2021 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 9/21/2021 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 9/21/2021. (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/23/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/22/2021. (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (10) Issued Electronically as to ANTONY BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, JANE DOE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATUL KESHAP, SHONNIE R. LYON, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOEL REIFMAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANTONY BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, JANE DOE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATUL KESHAP, SHONNIE R. LYON, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JOEL REIFMAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CHRISTOPHER WRAY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8732577) filed by SANTOSH KUMAR NAKIREDDI, SIRISHA CHIGURUPATI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Table, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Summons for U.S. Department of States, #11 Summons for U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, #12 Summons for Assistant Secretary of State Ian G. Brownlee, #13 Summons for Charge d'Affaires Atul Keshap, #14 Summons for Consul General Joel Reifman, #15 Summons for Nonimmigrant Visa Unit Officer Jane Doe, #16 Summons for U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, #17 Summons for OBIM Director Shonnie R. Lyon, #18 Summons for U.S. Attorney General, #19 Summons for FBI Director Christopher Wray, #20 Summons for Civil Process Clerk, U.S. Attorney)(Rosen, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
