WP COMPANY LLC v. U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE et al
| WP COMPANY LLC doing business as WASHINGTON POST |
| U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY |
| 1:2021cv02458 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER. The parties shall file an additional Joint Status Report by December 15, 2021, which updates the court on the processing and production of responsive records. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/9/2021. (lcapm1)
|
| Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT by U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. (Cirino, Paul) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER. Both a Complaint and an Answer are now before the court in this FOIA case. It is hereby ordered that the parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report on or before November 8, 2021. The Joint Status Report shall include (1) the status of Plaintiff's FOIA request; (2) the anticipated number of documents responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request; (3) the anticipated date(s) for release of the documents requested by Plaintiff; (4) whether a motion for a stay is likely under Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976); and (5) whether the parties anticipate summary judgment briefing and, if so, a proposed briefing schedule. See the attached Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 10/26/2021. (lcapm1)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY.(Cirino, Paul) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Cirino on behalf of U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (Cirino, Paul) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/23/2021. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/23/2021. (Tobin, Charles) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to U.S. Attorney. (ztth); Modified text on 9/23/2021 (ztth). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ); Modified text on 9/23/2021 (ztth). |
| Filing 4 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by WP COMPANY LLC (Tobin, Charles) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by WP COMPANY LLC. Case related to Case No. 21-cv-1025. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE to United States Attorney re #1 Complaint,, filed by WP COMPANY LLC. Related document: #1 Complaint,, filed by WP COMPANY LLC.(Tobin, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8743325) filed by WP COMPANY LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Related Case Form, #11 Proposed Summons to US Dep't of the Air Force, #12 Proposed Summons to US Dep't of the Navy, #13 Proposed Summons to US Attorney's Office, #14 Proposed Summons to US Attorney General)(Tobin, Charles) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
