BROWN v. MARY'S CENTER et al
| TAMARA BROWN |
| MARY'S CENTER, MARIA GOMEZ, TOLLIE ELLIOT, DEANNA MUNOZ, BETHLEHEM MULETA, INA ORTEZ, LINDSAY BEYAK and CARLOS MARQUINN |
| 1:2021cv02506 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDERED that, within 20 days of entry of this Order, the plaintiff shall provide her telephone number, and either shall provide a full residence address, or shall file a motion to use a post office box as the mailing address. It is further ORDERED that, within 20 days of entry of this Order, the plaintiff shall provide the complete address for each defendant. If plaintiff does not comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss the complaint and this civil action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/07/2021. (zsb)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TAMARA BROWN. (Attachment: #1 Supplement)(zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by TAMARA BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Counsel/Party, #2 Summons)(zsb) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 09/24/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
