KARTTE v. DAVIS et al
Mr. FELIX KARTTE and FELIX KARTTE |
Mr. TREVOR HUGH DAVIS, COUNTERACTION, LLC, TOSOMEONE, INC. and TREVOR HUGH DAVIS |
1:2021cv03310 |
December 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
James E Boasberg |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summons Returned Unexecuted by FELIX KARTTE as to TOSOMEONE, INC.. (King, J. Michael) |
Filing 6 Summons Returned Unexecuted by FELIX KARTTE as to COUNTERACTION, LLC. (King, J. Michael) |
Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted by FELIX KARTTE as to TREVOR HUGH DAVIS. (King, J. Michael) |
Filing 4 Case randomly reassigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. Judge Richard J. Leon is no longer assigned to the case. (rj) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by FELIX KARTTE.(King, J. Michael) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to COUNTERACTION, LLC, TREVOR HUGH DAVIS, TOSOMEONE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8939080), CIVIL COVER SHEET by FELIX KARTTE filed by FELIX KARTTE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(King, J. Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.