SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al v. ERICSSON AB et al
Petitioner: SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Respondent: ERICSSON AB, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and ERICSSON INC.
Case Number: 1:2021mc00047
Filed: May 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Tanya S Chutkan
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION to Withdraw Samsungs Motion Seeking the Issuance of Letters Rogatory For International Judicial Assistance. by SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.. (Lehman, Christine)
May 10, 2021 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #2 Motion to Withdraw Motion for Letters Rogatory; finding as moot #1 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 5/10/21. (DJS)
May 7, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zsb)
May 7, 2021 Filing fee received: $ 49, receipt number: 4616105551. (zsb)
May 4, 2021 NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory; emailed to clehman@reichmanjorgensen.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Filing fee for miscellaneous case not paid. Please remit filing fee payment via check or money order. In the future, do not file these kinds of cases electronically. (zsb, )
May 3, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for International Judicial Assistance by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Samsungs Unopposed Motion Seeking the Issuance of Letters Rogatory for International Judicial Assistance, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Lehman, Christine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al v. ERICSSON AB et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ERICSSON AB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ERICSSON INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC
Represented By: Christine Elisabeth Lehman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Represented By: Christine Elisabeth Lehman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?