SILVA v. MAYORKAS et al
PEDRO Alexandre Mendes Silva |
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and UR MENDOZA JADDOU |
1:2022cv00044 |
January 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Zia M Faruqui |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER. This Order shall replace the prior #3 Standing Order issued in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui on 2/24/2022. (lccr) |
CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui for all purposes. (znmg) |
MINUTE ORDER. Upon review of the #4 Parties' Notice, Consent, and Reference of this Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that the case shall proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on January 21, 2022. (lccjn2) |
Filing 4 NOTICE CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CIVIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE by PEDRO ALEXANDRE MENDES SILVA (Lal, Prerna) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on January 13, 2022. (lccjn2) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(znmg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (znmg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-8966889) filed by PEDRO Alexandre Mendes Silva. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Lal, Prerna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.