STATON v. VESTA CORPORATION
TONY STATON |
VESTA CORPORATION |
1:2022cv00374 |
February 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amit P Mehta |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RESPONSE re #10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by VESTA CORPORATION. (Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 11 REPLY re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by VESTA CORPORATION. (Rosenberg, David) Modified docket event/text on 3/24/2022 (zeg). |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by TONY STATON. (zeg) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by TONY STATON. (zeg) |
Filing 7 ORDER advising Plaintiff to respond by March 21, 2022, to Defendant Vesta Corporation's #6 Motion to Dismiss or risk dismissal of the case. See the attached Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 02/20/2022. (lcapm3) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by VESTA CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 8 Receipt on 2/17/2022 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2021 CA 003296 B. (zeg) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal. (znmg) |
Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (znmg) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth Maxwell Bernas on behalf of VESTA CORPORATION (Bernas, Kenneth) |
Filing 3 ERRATA by VESTA CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Corrected Notice of Removal)(Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by VESTA CORPORATION (Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2021 CA 003296 B Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADCDC-9039590 filed by VESTA CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rosenberg, David) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Notice of Removal; emailed to drosenberg@fordharrison.com, cc'd 1 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Noncompliance with LCvR 5.1(c). Please file an errata correcting the initiating pleading to include the name & full residence address of each party using the event Errata., 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (znmg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: STATON v. VESTA CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TONY STATON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: VESTA CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Kenneth Maxwell Bernas |
Represented By: | David A. Rosenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.