LEE v. MCP COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC.
| JAMES LEE |
| MCP Computer Products, Inc and MCP COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC. |
| 1:2022cv01848 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by MCP COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farrington, Daniel) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #4 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before September 22, 2022. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/26/2022.(lcrc2)
|
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JAMES LEE served on 8/11/2022, answer due 9/1/2022 (Mauro, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to MCP COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC.. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zsb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT James Lee against MCP Computer Products, Inc with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9337180) filed by JAMES LEE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Mauro, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
