CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY |
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS and DEB HAALAND |
1:2022cv02922 |
September 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Carl J Nichols |
Environmental Matters |
16 U.S.C. ยง 1540 Endangered Species Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Paul Segee on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Segee, Brian) (Main Document 10 replaced on 10/25/2022) (zed). |
Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/17/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Townsend, Margaret) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 10/11/22. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Townsend, Margaret) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DEB HAALAND served on 10/11/2022; U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE served on 10/11/2022; MARTHA WILLIAMS served on 10/11/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Service)(Townsend, Margaret) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on October 4, 2022. (lccjn1) |
MINUTE ORDER. The Court having considered Plaintiff's #3 Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice of Brian Segee, and it appearing to the Court that the attorney referenced therein meets the requirements for pro hac vice admission under Local Civil Rule 83.2(c), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Brian Segee is ADMITTED to practice before the Court pro hac vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a) #Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on October 4, 2022. (lccjn1) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb, ) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE filed by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY.(Townsend, Margaret) |
Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (znmw) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to mtownsend@biologicaldiversity.org, cc'd 4 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Incomplete Summonses; Missing attorney contact information; Please submit using the event Request for Summons to Issue. (znmw, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Brian Segee, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-9556626. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Brian Segee, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Townsend, Margaret) |
Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (Townsend, Margaret) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9556116) filed by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, #3 Summons to Martha Williams, #4 Summons to Deb Haaland, #5 Summons to U.S. Attorney General, #6 Summons to U.S. Attorney for DDC)(Townsend, Margaret) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.