CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA |
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE |
1:2022cv02959 |
September 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Beryl A Howell |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE served on 11/9/2022 (Bartkowski, Paul) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General November 15, 2022. (Bartkowski, Paul) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/7/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/7/2022. (Bartkowski, Paul) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer to plaintiff's #1 Complaint due by 12/23/2022. (ztg) |
MINUTE ORDER (paperless) GRANTING defendant's #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time, and DIRECTING defendant to file, by December 23, 2022, any response to plaintiff's #1 Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on November 10, 2022. (lcbah2) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Caplen, Robert) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Aaron Caplen on behalf of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (Caplen, Robert) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on October 5, 2022. (lcbah2) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb, ) |
Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (zcb, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9567431) filed by CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons DOD Summons, #3 Summons AG Summons, #4 Summons US Atty Summons, #5 Supplement Exhibit List, #6 Exhibit Ex. 1, #7 Exhibit Ex. 2, #8 Exhibit Ex. 3, #9 Exhibit Ex. 4, #10 Exhibit Ex. 5, #11 Exhibit Ex. 6, #12 Exhibit Ex. 7, #13 Exhibit Ex. 8, #14 Exhibit Ex. 9, #15 Exhibit Ex. 10, #16 Exhibit Ex. 11, #17 Exhibit Ex. 12)(Bartkowski, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Paul Michael Bartkowski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE | |
Represented By: | Robert Aaron Caplen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.