US RIGHT TO KNOW v. US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
Plaintiff: US RIGHT TO KNOW
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Not Classified By Court: US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE
Case Number: 1:2022cv03545
Filed: November 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to File. While counsel should have been keeping better track of his cases and should have filed a more timely motion for an extension of time, the motion will be granted notwithstanding plaintiff's objection. Defendant must file an answer to the complaint or otherwise respond by January 23, 2023. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 1/18/2023. (lcabj1)
January 17, 2023 Filing 4 RESPONSE re #3 MOTION for Leave to File Answer to Complaint filed by US RIGHT TO KNOW. (Hardin, Matthew)
January 14, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Answer to Complaint by NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. (Moustakas, John)
November 22, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmrl)
November 22, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zmrl)
November 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE, US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9687328) filed by US RIGHT TO KNOW. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (FOIA Request), #2 Exhibit B (Agency Letter), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Proposed to AG, USAO, and Agency/Agencies)(Hardin, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: US RIGHT TO KNOW v. US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: US RIGHT TO KNOW
Represented By: Matthew D. Hardin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Represented By: John Moustakas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?