ATKINS v. CHIKOSI
AVIS ATKINS |
TANAKA CHIKOSI |
1:2023cv00021 |
January 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall appear for an Initial Scheduling Conference on March 20, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., by video conference. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall submit a report and a proposed scheduling order pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.3(d) on or before March 13, 2023. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 2/17/2023. (lcrdm1) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against AVIS ATKINS by TANAKA CHIKOSI.(Krieger, Steven) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. TANAKA CHIKOSI served on 1/30/2023, answer due 2/20/2023 (Scott, Kathlyn) |
NOTICE OF ERROR regarding #5 Certificate of Service. The following error(s) need correction: Please refile using event: Service of Process - Summons returned Executed - Select parties that have been served and enter date of delivery (not date mailed). Please refile. (zjm) |
Filing 5 ENTERED IN ERROR.....CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by AVIS ATKINS PROCESS SERVER'S AFFIDAVIT. (Scott, Kathlyn) Modified on 2/3/2023 (zjm). |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/11/2023. (lcrdm1) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (1)Issued Electronically as to TANAKA CHIKOSI. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb) |
Filing 2 ERRATA Civil Cover Sheet Correction Required by AVIS ATKINS. (Scott, Kathlyn) |
Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zcb) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to kscott@scottbackmanlaw.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Please select 1(one) associated category related to your complaint, 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (Briggs, Charles) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT by Avis Atkins against Tanaka Chikosi [next phrase "against Avis Atkins" appears in error and should be disregarded] against AVIS ATKINS with Jury Demand In Excess of $75,000.00 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9766800) filed by AVIS ATKINS. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scott, Kathlyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ATKINS v. CHIKOSI | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: AVIS ATKINS | |
Represented By: | Kathlyn Scott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: TANAKA CHIKOSI | |
Represented By: | Steven Andrew Krieger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.