ATKINS v. CHIKOSI
Plaintiff: AVIS ATKINS
Defendant: TANAKA CHIKOSI
Case Number: 1:2023cv00021
Filed: January 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Randolph D Moss
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall appear for an Initial Scheduling Conference on March 20, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., by video conference. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall submit a report and a proposed scheduling order pursuant to Local Civil Rule 16.3(d) on or before March 13, 2023. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 2/17/2023. (lcrdm1)
February 16, 2023 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against AVIS ATKINS by TANAKA CHIKOSI.(Krieger, Steven)
February 6, 2023 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. TANAKA CHIKOSI served on 1/30/2023, answer due 2/20/2023 (Scott, Kathlyn)
February 3, 2023 NOTICE OF ERROR regarding #5 Certificate of Service. The following error(s) need correction: Please refile using event: Service of Process - Summons returned Executed - Select parties that have been served and enter date of delivery (not date mailed). Please refile. (zjm)
February 2, 2023 Filing 5 ENTERED IN ERROR.....CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by AVIS ATKINS PROCESS SERVER'S AFFIDAVIT. (Scott, Kathlyn) Modified on 2/3/2023 (zjm).
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/11/2023. (lcrdm1)
January 9, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS (1)Issued Electronically as to TANAKA CHIKOSI. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zcb)
January 6, 2023 Filing 2 ERRATA Civil Cover Sheet Correction Required by AVIS ATKINS. (Scott, Kathlyn)
January 6, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zcb)
January 5, 2023 NOTICE OF ERROR re #1 Complaint; emailed to kscott@scottbackmanlaw.com, cc'd 0 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Please select 1(one) associated category related to your complaint, 2. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE is by close of business today. This case will not proceed any further until all errors are satisfied. (Briggs, Charles)
January 4, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT by Avis Atkins against Tanaka Chikosi [next phrase "against Avis Atkins" appears in error and should be disregarded] against AVIS ATKINS with Jury Demand In Excess of $75,000.00 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9766800) filed by AVIS ATKINS. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scott, Kathlyn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ATKINS v. CHIKOSI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AVIS ATKINS
Represented By: Kathlyn Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TANAKA CHIKOSI
Represented By: Steven Andrew Krieger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?