KIMNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| AUDREY L. KIMMER and AUDREY L. KIMNER |
| THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, JOHN ROBERTS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2023cv00449 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
NEW Pro Se Consent To Receive Notices of Electronic Filing by AUDREY L. KIMNER. (ztth)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Permission to Use Post Office Box by AUDREY L. KIMNER. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsl)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER that, within 20 days of entry of this Order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint containing her full residence address in its caption, or alternatively, a motion setting forth reasons to use the P.O. Box address. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 02/24/2023. (zsl)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AUDREY L. KIMNER. (zrtw)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by AUDREY L. KIMNER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(zrtw)
|
|
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 2/14/2023. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zrtw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
