PEDDEN v. USA
Plaintiff: IAIN D. PEDDEN
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2011cv00207
Filed: April 4, 2011
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Victor J. Wolski
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 154 UNREPORTED OPINION AND ORDER: The plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record 140 is DENIED, and the defendant's cross-motion for judgment on the administrative record 147 is GRANTED.The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. No costs are awarded. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (dhf) Service on parties made.
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 86 REPORTED OPINION on 69 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by USA. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (ah) Service on parties made.
Search for this case: PEDDEN v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IAIN D. PEDDEN
Represented By: Eric Sebastian Montalvo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Michael Duane Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?