WAGSTAFF v. USA
Plaintiff: AUDREY S. WAGSTAFF
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2011cv00466
Filed: July 18, 2011
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Susan G. Braden
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 PUBLISHED MEMORANDUM OPINION and FINAL ORDER granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment and finding as moot 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Government. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (dls) Copy to parties.
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 UNPUBLISHED OPINION on 9 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) filed by USA granting in part and denying in part. All the claims alleged in the July 18, 2011 Complaint are dismissed except Plaintiff's claim that the Department of Education effected an illegal exaction when it ordered Plaintiff's wages to be garnished on September 13, 2005.Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (bre) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: WAGSTAFF v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AUDREY S. WAGSTAFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?