HYPERION, INC. v. USA
Plaintiff: HYPERION, INC.
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2014cv00870
Filed: September 18, 2014
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Lettow
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 REPORTED OPINION denying 18 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1); granting 18 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. The government's motion to dismiss under RCFC 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. The gov ernment's motion to dismiss under RCFC 12(b)(6), or alternatively for summary judgment under RCFC 56, is converted into one for judgment on the administrative record under RCFC 52.1 and that motion is GRANTED. The clerk shall enter judgment in accord with this disposition. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (gk)
Search for this case: HYPERION, INC. v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HYPERION, INC.
Represented By: Cyrus Eastman Phillips, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Ryan Michael Majerus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?