HERRMANN et al v. USA
Plaintiff: JEFFREY W. HERRMANN and MINA GEROWIN HERRMANN
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2014cv00941
Filed: October 3, 2014
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Lettow
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 110 REPORTED ORDER reflecting no redactions from the opinion and order previously entered under seal on June 12, 2017. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (EK)
January 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 78 REPORTED OPINION granting 64 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Designations of Deposition Testimony; granting 65 Defendant's Cross Motion for Leave to File Designations of Deposition Testimony; denying 66 Non-Parties' Motion i n Limine to Testify Via Contemporaneous Video Transmission; granting 67 Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Remove Attorneys' Eyes Only Designations; denying 68 Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Summary Exhibits and the Testimony of Evan Cohen. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (EK)
May 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 55 REPORTED OPINION granting 40 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 49 Cross-Motion for a Protective Order. For the reasons stated, the plaintiffs' motion to compel directed to the government is GRANTED. The government shall submit a notice of compliance with this order by June 3, 2016. Plaintiffs' motion to compel directed at Paulson is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Paulson shall submit a notice of c ompliance consistent with the limitations specified in this order by June 3, 2016. Paulson's cross-motion for a protective order is also GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court has amended the protective order issued in this case as described in this opinion. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (aj)
October 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 REPORTED OPINION: For the reasons stated, the government's motion for partial dismissal is DENIED. Plaintiffs' motion to strike is DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment is also DENIED. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an exhibit is GRANTED. On or before November 20, 2015, the court requests that the parties submit a joint status report that addresses further proceedings in this action. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (aj)
Search for this case: HERRMANN et al v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY W. HERRMANN
Represented By: Nathan E. Clukey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MINA GEROWIN HERRMANN
Represented By: Nathan E. Clukey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Matthew Douglas Lucey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?