BIAS v. USA
RONALD BIAS |
USA |
1:2015cv00634 |
June 19, 2015 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Charles F. Lettow |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 REPORTED OPINION granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; granting 26 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; denying 27 Cross Motion for judgment on the administrative record. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (USPS Tracking # 7014 1200 0000 9093 7627)(vds) Copy to parties. |
Filing 16 REPORTED ORDER granting 11 Motion to Remand, with the case to be remanded to the BCNR for a period not to exceed six months; staying the case pending the results of the remand; and directing defendant to submit status reports every 90 days. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (dls) Copy to parties and certified copy of the order served on the BCNR. |
Search for this case: BIAS v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RONALD BIAS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Michael Damien Snyder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.