STIMSON LUMBER COMPANY v. USA
| 1:2018cv00983 |
| May 8, 2020 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| Taking - Rails to Trails |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
Order of Dismissal -- Dismissing with prejudice the final remaining claims. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Nancy B. Firestone. (dpk) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
61
REPORTED OPINION on 52 MOTION for Attorney Fees PLAINTIFFS MOTION AND MEMORANDUM FOR AN AWARD OF REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS UNDER THE UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISTION POLICIES ACT OF 1970 filed by STIMSO N LUMBER COMPANY granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion for Attorney Fees. The parties are shall file a joint status report by 8/13/2021, with an updated calculation of attorneys fees and costs made in accordance with the instructions in t his opinion. Stimson Lumber shall attach to this joint status report documentation supporting any additional requests for attorneys fees and costs incurred after April 7, 2021. The parties shall also provide in this joint status report an update on the progress made in the settlement of just compensation and interest in this case and a proposal for further proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge Nancy B. Firestone. (dpk) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing
41
REPORTED OPINION denying 33 plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment and granting 37 defendant's cross motion. Joint status report due 10/1/2020. Signed by Senior Judge Nancy B. Firestone. (lb) Service on parties made.
|
| Search for this case: STIMSON LUMBER COMPANY v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
