AMIR v. USA
Case Number: 1:2020cv01045
Filed: July 15, 2021
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
Nature of Suit: Miscellaneous - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 REPORTED OPINION denying 25 motion for reconsideration. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith because, as alleged, Mr. Amir's claims are clearly beyond t he subject matter jurisdiction of this court. The clerk's office shall REJECT any further filings in this case. Signed by Senior Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (jb2) Service on parties made. plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (dls)
July 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 REPORTED OPINION granting 8 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1); finding as moot 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith because, as alleged, Mr. Amir's claims are clearly beyond the subject matter jurisdiction of this court. Mr. Amir is immediately ENJOINED from filing any new complaints with this court without an order from the chief judge of the court granting leave to file a complaint. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (jb2) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (dls)
Search for this case: AMIR v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?