Brown v. The Florida Bar et al
Anna L. Brown |
The Florida Bar, The Supreme Court of Florida, R. Fred Lewis, Charles T. Wells, Harry Lee Anstead, Barbara J. Pariente, Peggy A. Quince, Raoul G. Cantero and Kenneth B. Bell |
2:2008cv00308 |
March 11, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Hillsborough |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
John E. Steele |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 OPINION AND ORDER granting 61 Motion to dismiss; granting 64 Motion to dismiss; denying 71 Motion to strike; granting 73 Motion for leave to file supplement response and the 70 Supplemental Memorandum is accepted as filed. The Second Amend ed Complaint is dismissed for the reasons stated in the Opinion and Order. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of the defendants and against plaintiff. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and deadlines as moot and close the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/22/2010. (RKR) |
Filing 59 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion to dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to dismiss. Defendants are dismissed from all counts of the Amended Complaint but plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this Opinion and Order setting forth her federal claim in what is currently Count VI. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 5/29/2009. (RKM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.