Goros v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
||George T. Goros
||Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
||March 25, 2016
||US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
||Ft. Myers Office
||Sheri Polster Chappell
|Nature of Suit:
||Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 6, 2017
ORDER granting 37 Plaintiff George T. Goros and Defendant Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada's Joint Motion to Withdraw Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Non-Taxable Costs and Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Non-Taxable Costs 34 is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter an amended judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/6/2017. (LMF)
|August 28, 2017
ORDER adopting 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 19 MOTION for summary judgment or for Judgment on the Record, and memorandum of Law in Support filed by Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, 22 MOTION for summary judgment < i>and Motion for judgment. Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando's Report and Recommendation 29 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. Sun Life's Motion for Summary Judgment 19 is GRANTED.Goros' Motion for Summary Judgment 22 is DENIED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and to close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/28/2017. (LMF)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?