Harris v. Rambosk et al
| Robert Dale Harris |
| Kevin Rambosk, Kasey P. Wingo, Michael D. Chapman and Brian R. Wiedel |
| 2:2018cv00017 |
| January 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Collier |
| John E. Steele |
| Mac R. McCoy |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
268
ORDER denying 263 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/24/2022. (AFC)
|
|
Filing
256
Draft Jury Instructions. (TLP)
|
|
Filing
247
OPINION and ORDER denying 223 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Limit the Trial to Damages Only Based on the Law of the Case; denying 225 Plaintiff's Opposed Motion in Limine/Daubert Motion Directed to the Testimony of Defense Expert Dr. Lori Butts; denying 226 Plaintiff's Opposed Motion in Limine/Daubert Motion Directed to the Testimony of Defendants' Expert Dr. Richard Hough; granting 227 Plaintiff's Opposed Motion in Limine Regarding Plaintiff's Arrest and Juvenile Record; granting 228Defendant Kasey Wingo's Motion in Limine; granting 229Defendant Michael D. Chapman's Motion in Limine. See ORDER for further details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 10/29/2021. (TLP)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to enter judgment granting defendant Scott Pepin's MOTION for Summary Judgment 113 as to the statute of limitations issue. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 12/30/2020. (TLP)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER granting 180 Motion for Reconsideration. Upon reconsideration, the Motion for Summary Judgment 113 is granted as to statute of limitations issue. The alternative relief for § 1292(b) Certification is denied as moot. The Clerk shall withhold entry of judgment until after the case is returned from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/5/2020. (TLP)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER granting defendant's 177 Motion to Stay; denying without prejudice defendant's 144 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice defendant's 145 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice plaintiff's 147 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 148 Motion in Limine; denying without prejudice defendant's 150 Motion in Limine. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/7/2019. (CMG)
|
|
Filing
183
OPINION and ORDER granting defendant's 126 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/6/2019. (CMG)
|
|
Filing
175
OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's 113 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/5/2019. (CMG)
|
|
Filing
138
OPINION AND ORDER denying 103 Motion for Leave to File Out of Time Second Amended Complaint; adopting 134 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/18/2019. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
75
OPINION and ORDER granting defendant's 63 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 10/18/2018. (CMG)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER denying as moot defendant's 33 motion to dismiss; denying as moot defendant's 35 motion to dismiss; denying as moot plaintiff's 38 motion to strike. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 8/14/2018. (CMG)
|
|
Filing
69
OPINION and ORDER granting 61 plaintiff's Motion to Strike. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/23/2018. (CMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
