Cisco Systems, Inc. et al v. ABARAM NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
Cisco Systems, Inc. and CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC. |
TJR PROCUREMENT, LLC, STEFANIT TESFAYE, DAVID JESSE MACDOUGALL, Does 1-50, ABARAM NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. and Abaram Network Solutions, Inc.. |
2:2018cv00354 |
June 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Collier |
Mac R McCoy |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 6/28/2018. (MLS) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly L. Davis for defendants, ABARAM NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., Does 1-50, DAVID JESSE MACDOUGALL, STEFANIT TESFAYE, TJR PROCUREMENT, LLC. (MLS) |
Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against ABARAM NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., Does 1-50, DAVID JESSE MACDOUGALL, STEFANIT TESFAYE, TJR PROCUREMENT, LLC with Jury Demand filed by Cisco Systems, Inc., CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC..(MLS) |
Sealed Document S-13. (MLS) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE disclosure statement by CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC., Cisco Systems, Inc.. (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-5. (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-4 (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-3 (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-2 (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-12. (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-11 (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-7 (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-1 (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-9. (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-10. (MLS) |
Sealed Document S-6. (MLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.