Burgos et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
| Cossette Burgos and Alejandro Burgos |
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| 2:2019cv00069 |
| February 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John E Steele |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER directing the Clerk to close the case pursuant to the parties' #17 stipulation. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/14/2019. (RKR)
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice (Joint) by Alejandro Burgos, Cossette Burgos. (Savio, Christian) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER directing Alejandro Burgos, Cossette Burgos to respond to #10 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. Responses due by 3/14/2019. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/28/2019. (RKR)
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #8 Interested persons order by Alejandro Burgos, Cossette Burgos. (Savio, Christian) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #7 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Alejandro Burgos, Cossette Burgos. Related case(s): no (Savio, Christian) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #8 Interested persons order by Bank of America, N.A.. (Parrino, Marc) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #7 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Bank of America, N.A.. Related case(s): no (Parrino, Marc) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER taking no further action on #6 Order. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/14/2019. (RKR)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by Bank of America, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Parrino, Marc) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Notice of Removal, #6 Order by Bank of America, N.A.. (Parrino, Marc) |
| Filing 8 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 2/25/2019. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/11/2019. (WRW) |
|
Filing 7
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 2/25/2019. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/11/2019. (WRW)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing defendant to file a supplement to the Notice of Removal, or show cause, within 7 days why the case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/6/2019. (RKR)
|
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 2/6/2019. (RMT) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Bank of America, N.A. with Jury Demand filed by Cossette Burgos, Alejandro Burgos.(RMT) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Unassigned Judge and Magistrate Judge Unassigned Magistrate. New case number: 2:19-cv-69-FtM-99UAM. (SJB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Bank of America, N.A. re #1 Notice of Removal of Filing Civil Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parrino, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lee County Circuit Court, case number 19-CA-374 filed in State Court on January 21, 2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15093365 filed by Bank of America, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parrino, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
