Eubanks v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Dewey Lee Eubanks |
| Commissioner of Social Security and U.S. Attorney |
| SSA |
| 2:2021cv00279 |
| April 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Mac R McCoy |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS returned executed by Dewey Lee Eubanks. U.S. Attorney served on 4/9/2021, answer due 6/8/2021. (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 7 PROOF of service by Dewey Lee Eubanks (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 6 PROOF of service by Dewey Lee Eubanks (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Civil Action Order by Dewey Lee Eubanks. (Avard, Carol) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 4/13/2021. (RMT) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (RMT) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John L. Badalamenti and Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy. New case number: 2:21-cv-0279-JLB-MRM. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 113A-18072570) filed by Dewey Lee Eubanks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Avard, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
