Munoz Dita v. Danay Services LLC et al
| ROGELIO MUNOZ DITA |
| DAYNAY SERVICES LLC., NAYMI RODRIGUEZ AVILA and Daynay Services LLC |
| 2:2024cv00266 |
| March 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Nicholas P Mizell |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
TEXT ORDER: The parties have agreed that plaintiff will file an amended complaint. (Doc. #24). By May 29, 2024, plaintiff must file the contemplated amended complaint. And given the forthcoming amended complaint, defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. #21) is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 5/15/2024. (JMM)
|
| Filing 24 SUPPLEMENT re #21 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Local Rule 3.01(g)(3) Supplement by Daynay Services LLC, Naymi Rodriguez Avila. (Elkins, Michael) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE by Daynay Services LLC, Naymi Rodriguez Avila re #12 Case Management Scheduling Order (Elkins, Michael) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of compliance re #12 Case Management Scheduling Order Plaintiff's evidence served by email to Defendants by Rogelio Munoz Dita (Schlade, Daniel) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Daynay Services LLC, Naymi Rodriguez Avila. (Elkins, Michael) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of compliance re 11 Order to Strike 17 Order directing compliance by Daynay Services LLC, Naymi Rodriguez Avila (Elkins, Michael) |
| Filing 19 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Naymi Rodriguez Avila. (Elkins, Michael) |
| Filing 18 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Daynay Services LLC. (Elkins, Michael) |
|
Filing 17
TEXT ORDER: Defendants filed a disclosure statement that failed to comply with Local Rule 3.03. So the court struck it and directed defendants to refile using the proper form--to which the court even provided a direct link. However, defendants' re-filed disclosure statement still utilized an outdated form. (Doc. #14). By May 3, 2024, defendants must file their disclosure statement using the proper form or show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failure to comply with the local rule and court order. The clerk is directed to delete the PDF file (Doc. 14) from the CM/ECF docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 5/1/2024. (JMM)
|
|
Filing 16
ENDORSED ORDER granting #15 defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time. By May 9, 2024, defendants must respond to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 4/29/2024. (JMM)
|
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Respond to Complaint by All Defendants. (Elkins, Michael) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Daynay Services LLC, Naymi Rodriguez Avila. (Elkins, Michael) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Michael Entin on behalf of Daynay Services LLC, Naymi Rodriguez Avila (Entin, Joshua) |
|
Filing 12
FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 4/12/2024. (WRW)
|
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER: Local Rule 3.03 requires that each party file a disclosure statement using the standard form from the clerk or the court's website. However, in filing their disclosure, defendants used an outdated form. As such, the paper is deemed stricken, and the clerk is directed to delete the PDF file (Doc. 10) from the CM/ECF docket. By April 26, 2024, defendants must refile their disclosure statement using the proper form, which can be found at: https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/form/disclosure-statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 4/12/2024. (JMM)
|
| Filing 10 ***STRICKEN-IMAGE REMOVED PURSUANT TO 11 ORDER*** CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Civil Action Order by Daynay Services LLC, Naymi Rodriguez Avila identifying Corporate Parent DAYNAY SERVICES LLC. for Daynay Services LLC. (Elkins, Michael) Modified on 4/12/2024 (LSS). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael L. Elkins on behalf of Daynay Services LLC, Naymi Rodriguez Avila (Elkins, Michael) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 04/08/2024 by Rogelio Munoz Dita as to Naymi Rodriguez Avila. (Schlade, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on 04/08/2024 by Rogelio Munoz Dita as to Daynay Services LLC. (Schlade, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Daynay Services LLC, Naymi Rodriguez Avila. (RLK) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Action Order Signed by All Divisional Judges on 3/25/2024. (WRW) |
| Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge John L. Badalamenti and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:24-cv-266-JLB-NPM. (ARL) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Rogelio Munoz Dita. (Schlade, Daniel) Modified text on 3/25/2024 (SET). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lead Attorney Appearance by Daniel Schlade on behalf of Rogelio Munoz Dita(Schlade, Daniel) Modified text on 3/25/2024 (SET). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daynay Services LLC., Naymi Rodriguez Avila with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21902928) filed by Rogelio Munoz Dita. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Calculation of Plaintiff's Damages, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons Daynay Services LLC, #4 Proposed Summons Naymi Rodriguez Avila)(Schlade, Daniel) Modified to edit docket text on 3/26/2024 (RLK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
