Dyer, III v. Commissioner of Social Security
Alexius A. Dyer, III |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
3:2023cv01416 |
December 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Patricia D Barksdale |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings re #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Transcript Part 2)(Windham, Robert) |
Filing 6 Notice of substitution of AUSA. Robert Dalton Windham substituting for Nadine DeLuca Elder. (Windham, Robert) |
Filing 5 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 3:23-cv-1416-PDB. (RLK) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Erik William Berger on behalf of Alexius A. Dyer, III. Lead Counsel: Erik W. Berger. (Berger, Erik) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Alexius A. Dyer, III. Related case(s): No (Berger, Erik) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Alexius A. Dyer, III. (Berger, Erik) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $405 receipt number AFLMDC-21522691). The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Alexius A. Dyer, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Berger, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.