Kaplan v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Howard Kaplan |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 5:2018cv00404 |
| August 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ocala Office |
| Sumter |
| Wm Terrell Hodges |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed by Howard Kaplan. Commissioner of Social Security served on 8/13/2018, answer due 10/12/2018. (Attachments: #1 summons executed with proof of service, #2 summons executed with proof of service)(Pierre Pierre, Eddy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Howard Kaplan. Related case(s): No (Pierre Pierre, Eddy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 8/2/2018. (Copy delivered electronically)(MLS) |
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) (MLS)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (MLS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number OCA-9467) filed by Howard Kaplan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
