Tassa-Racha v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp

Plaintiff: Adelaide Tassa-Racha
Defendant: R.T.G. Furniture Corp
Case Number: 5:2019cv00291
Filed: June 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Philip R Lammens
Referring Judge: James S Moody
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Adelaide Tassa-Racha. Summons provided. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
June 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R.T.G. Furniture Corp with Jury Demand filed by Adelaide Tassa-Racha. (no service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(RLK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tassa-Racha v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adelaide Tassa-Racha
Represented By: Matthew W. Birk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.T.G. Furniture Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?