Securities and Exchange Commission v. Efuel EFN Corp. et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Slavoljub Stefanovic, Efuel EFN Corp. and Ljubica Stefanovic |
| 5:2019cv00482 |
| September 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Philip R Lammens |
| James S Moody |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 RETURN of service executed on 10/14/2019 by Securities and Exchange Commission as to Efuel EFN Corp., Ljubica Stefanovic, Slavoljub Stefanovic.(see at docs's 20,21, and 22) (RLK) |
| Filing 22 PROOF of service by Securities and Exchange Commission (Dunnigan, Christopher) |
| Filing 21 PROOF of service by Securities and Exchange Commission (Dunnigan, Christopher) |
| Filing 20 PROOF of service by Securities and Exchange Commission (Dunnigan, Christopher) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Correction by Efuel EFN Corp., Ljubica Stefanovic, Slavoljub Stefanovic. (RLK) |
Filing 18
ORDER: The Answer (Doc. #16) is STRICKEN as to Defendant Efuel EFN Corp. Efuel EFN Corp. shall have counsel appear and respond to the Complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Failure to do so will result in the Court entering a default against Efuel EFN Corp. upon proper motion from the Commission. Defendants' request for hearing (Doc. #17) is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/1/2019. (SMB)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Hearing by Efuel EFN Corp., Ljubica Stefanovic, Slavoljub Stefanovic. (RLK) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint *** STRICKEN AS TO DEFENDANT EFUEL EFN, CORP ONLY PER ORDER SEE DOC 18*** by Efuel EFN Corp., Ljubica Stefanovic, Slavoljub Stefanovic.(RLK) Modified on 11/4/2019 (RLK). |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS issued as to Efuel EFN Corp. (LAB) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS issued as to Ljubica Stefanovic. (LAB) |
| Filing 13 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Enright, John) |
| Filing 12 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Enright, John) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS issued as to Slavoljub Stefanovic. (LAB) |
|
Filing 10
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 9/26/2019. (KAC)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Tuongvy T. Le on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission (Le, Tuongvy) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John O. Enright on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission (Enright, John) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Dunnigan, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Dunnigan, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Dunnigan, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of filing Civil Cover Sheet by Securities and Exchange Commission re #1 Complaint. (Dunnigan, Christopher) Modified on 9/25/2019 (LAB). |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:19-cv-482-Oc-30PRL. (SJB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J. Dunnigan on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission (Dunnigan, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Efuel EFN Corp., Ljubica Stefanovic, Slavoljub Stefanovic with Jury Demand filed by Securities and Exchange Commission.(Dunnigan, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
