Campbell v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Chares Melvin Campbell, Jr and Charles Melvin Campbell, Jr |
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium |
5:2019cv00584 |
November 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Philip R Lammens |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER to respond to habeas petition and notice to petitioner. Petitioner has 45 days to reply to the petition response. Clerk is directed to serve the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 1/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Petition)(CRR) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Charles Melvin Campbell, Jr. Related case(s): no. (RLK) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 11/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Attachement)(RLK) |
Filing 2 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - HABEAS track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 12/3/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 11/19/2019. (BGS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal (Filing fee $ 5.00, receipt number OCA-10755) filed by Chares Melvin Campbell, Jr. (No service copies provided)(LMF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.