Singh v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
| SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Florida Attorney General |
| Kenard Singh |
| 5:2019cv00617 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Roy B Dalton |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. and Notice to Petitioner. Petitioner has 45 days to reply to the petition response. Clerk is directed to serve the petition. (Marion County). Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 1/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Petition)(CRR)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Sworn Oath for 2254 Petition by Kenard Singh (Reese, Rachael) Modified on 12/30/2019 (HAI). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 1 (JLC) |
| Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:19-cv-617-Oc-37PRL. (SJB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of filing Civil Cover Sheet by Kenard Singh (Reese, Rachael) Modified on 12/6/2019 (LMF). |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in support re #1 Petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Kenard Singh. (Reese, Rachael) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 113A-16215456) filed by Kenard Singh.(Reese, Rachael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
