Jeudy v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Lenncy Jeudy and Lency Jeudy |
| U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Homeland Security and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 5:2020cv00044 |
| February 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $0.00 as provided in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(b)(1)(A). Plaintiff is assessed the total $350.00 filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Supervisor, Inmate Trust Funds at Plaintiff's current place of incarceration. The Clerk is also directed to terminate the motion associated with the mandamus petition (Doc. 1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 3/3/2020. (CRR)
|
| Filing 11 Notice of substitution of AUSA. Scott H. Park substituting for Natalie Diaz. (Park, Scott) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lenncy Jeudy. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 2/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(RLK)
|
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Florida Southern; Case Number 1:19-cv-24396. File received electronically |
|
Filing 6
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING #5 Report and Recommendations. The Clerk is instructed to transfer this case to the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Florida and mark this case as CLOSED in this District. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 2/7/2020. See attached document for full details. (wc) [Transferred from flsd on 2/10/2020.]
|
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 1:19-cv-24396 electronically transferred out to Florida Middle. (wc) [Transferred from flsd on 2/10/2020.] |
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on MANDAMUS case re #1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus filed by Lenncy Jeudy; Recommending that the instant petition be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, for all further proceedings, and the case CLOSED. Objections to R&R due by 1/31/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 1/17/2020. See attached document for full details. (fbn) [Transferred from flsd on 2/10/2020.] |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 10/30/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn) [Transferred from flsd on 2/10/2020.]
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Natalie Diaz on behalf of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party Homeland Security(pty:dft), Attorney Natalie Diaz added to party U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft). (Diaz, Natalie) [Transferred from flsd on 2/10/2020.] |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. (drz) [Transferred from flsd on 2/10/2020.] |
| Filing 1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus against Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Filing fee $ 400.00 not paid/no ifp filed, filed by Lenncy Jeudy.(drz) [Transferred from flsd on 2/10/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
