Jacobs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Plaintiff: David Aaron Jacobs
Defendant: C Rijos, J.M. Henger, Federal Bureau of Prisons and FNU Mumm
Case Number: 5:2020cv00231
Filed: May 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Brian J Davis
Referring Judge: Philip R Lammens
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2020 Filing 8 JUDGMENT entered dismissing case without prejudice. Civil appeals checklist attached. (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (HAI)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER dismissing the case without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); directions to the Clerk. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 6/25/2020. (KLC)
June 19, 2020 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against FNU Mumm filed by David Aaron Jacobs. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by David Aaron Jacobs. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1)(HAI)
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER to file amended complaint. Plaintiff must file an Amended Complaint within 21 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk shall forward Plaintiff a Civil Rights Complaint form marked "Amended Complaint." Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 6/2/2020. (CRR)
May 29, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 5/29/2020. (CKS)
May 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for all confined, pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 5/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(RLK)
May 27, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by David Aaron Jacobs. (RLK) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens.
May 27, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Prisons, J.M. Henger, C Rijos filed by David Aaron Jacobs. (no service copies provided)(RLK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacobs v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C Rijos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.M. Henger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU Mumm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Aaron Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?