Dixie Metal Products, Inc. v. Peddinghaus Corporation
| Dixie Metal Products, Inc. |
| Peddinghaus Corporation |
| 5:2021cv00441 |
| August 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anne C Conway |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION for Dismissal with Prejudice of Dismissal by Peddinghaus Corporation. (Ducayet, James) Modified on 6/15/2022 (HAI). |
Filing 20
ORDER dismissing case re #19 Stipulation of Dismissal. The parties have until 6/14/22 to submit a stipulated form of final or judgment should they choose. All pending motions are denied as moot and the clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 2/24/2022. (copies mailed/emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION of Dismissal by Peddinghaus Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ross, Ian) Modified on 2/23/2022 (HAI). |
|
Filing 18
ORDER directing counsel to advise the court of the outcome of the mediation which occurred on February 1, 2022 #17. Response due within 14 days. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 2/11/2022. (copies mailed/emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of mediation conference/hearing to be held on 2/1/2022 10:00 a.m. before James L Nulman. (Soto, Oscar) |
| Filing 16 CASE REFERRED to Mediation. Designated lead counsel shall contact opposing counsel and mediator, select a mediation date and file a notice with the court within 14 days advising the court of the scheduled mediation conference date. Counsel shall confirm that mediator is on the court's approved mediator list (address differs from what parties listed on their Case Management Report to what is listed on the court's approved list on the website). (counsel emailed) (AKC) |
|
Filing 15
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 12/17/2021 Joinder of Parties due by 12/17/2021 Discovery due by 5/2/2022 Dispositive motions due by 5/16/2022 Pretrial statement due by 9/26/2022 All other motions due by 6/15/2022 Plaintiff disclosure of expert report due by 3/4/2022 Defendant disclosure of expert report due by 4/1/2022 Bench Trial set for trial term which commences on 11/1/2022 at 09:00 AM in Orlando Courtroom 6 A before Judge Anne C. Conway. Conduct mediation hearing by 5/16/2022. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 10/22/2021. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY to #11 Counterclaim and Affirmative Defenses by Dixie Metal Products, Inc.. Related document: #11 Answer to ComplaintCounterclaim filed by Peddinghaus Corporation.(Soto, Oscar) Modified on 10/13/2021 (HAI). |
| Filing 13 Case Reassigned to Judge Anne C. Conway. New case number: 5:21-cv-441-ACC-PRL. Judge James S. Moody, Jr no longer assigned to the case. (LMF) |
| Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Soto, Oscar) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Dixie Metal Products, Inc. by Peddinghaus Corporation.(Ross, Ian) |
|
Filing 10
ENDORSED ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 9/21/2021. (JG)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for James W. Ducayet to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-18725516 for $150 by Peddinghaus Corporation. (Ross, Ian) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Set/reset deadlines/hearings: for Peddinghaus Corporation. Answer due by 9/21/2021. (HAI) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 5 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Dixie Metal Products, Inc.. (Soto, Oscar) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response / Reply: Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended through and including September 21, 2021. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 9/3/2021. (JG)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal by Peddinghaus Corporation. (Ross, Ian) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KAC) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Peddinghaus Corporation. (Ross, Ian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Peddinghaus Corporation. Related case(s): No (Ross, Ian) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:21-cv-0441-JSM-PRL. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial Circuit in and for Marion County, case number 21-CA-001385-AX filed in State Court on July 28, 2021. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-18644021 filed by Peddinghaus Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ross, Ian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dixie Metal Products, Inc. v. Peddinghaus Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dixie Metal Products, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Oscar E. Soto |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Peddinghaus Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Ian M. Ross |
| Represented By: | James W. Ducayet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
