Larson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Randal John Larson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 5:2022cv00176 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Timothy J Corrigan |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LAB)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Standing Order on Management of Social Security Cases, 3:21-mc-1-TJC, Doc. #43. (LAB)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Nadine Elder on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Elder, Nadine)
|
|
Filing 4
NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Timothy J. Corrigan and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:22-cv-0176-TJC-PRL. (SJB)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Randal John Larson. Related case(s): No (Berger, Erik)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Randal John Larson. (Berger, Erik)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-19426334) filed by Randal John Larson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Berger, Erik)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
